Day #1: Sell Your TV

August 31, 2010 by DrReynolds · 1 Comment 

Consider the following:

Several European countries forbid or severely curtail advertising to children; in the United States, on the other hand, selling to children is simply “business as usual.”  The average young person views more than 3000 ads per day on television (TV), on the Internet, on billboards, and in magazines.  Increasingly, advertisers are targeting younger and younger children in an effort to establish “brand-name preference” at as early an age as possible.  This targeting occurs because advertising is a $250 billion/year industry with 900,000 brands to sell,  and children and adolescents are attractive consumers: teenagers spend $155 billion/year, children younger than 12 years spend another $25 billion, and both groups influence perhaps another $200 billion of their parents’ spending per year. Increasingly, advertisers are seeking to find new and creative ways of targeting young consumers via the Internet, in schools, and even in bathroom stalls.

Obviously, you cannot send your child around blind-folded everywhere they go.  However, one source of particularly BAD advertising comes from the TV.  Don’t think the stuff your child sees on TV influences them?  Think again!  Consider these FACTS:

  1. For children between the age of 2-48 months, each hour of daily TV viewing decreases their language score by 2.68 points.
  2. The tobacco industry spends $30-Million/DAY on advertising, much of which is on TV ads and subtle glamorization in movies.   Up to 1/3 of smoking initiation in children is directly related to this advertising.  Worse, this advertising appears to be even more influential than strong parenting practices.
  3. The alcohol industry spends $5.7 Billion/year on advertising.  The average kids will view 2000 ads for alcohol on TV each year.  There is a strong correlation between exposure to alcohol advertising and adolescent drinking.  Beer commercials (by far the most sensational and common) appear to be a particularly strong risk factor.
  4. Food advertisers spend $2.5 Billion/year on restaurants advertising and another $2 Billion year on food advertising.  As you can imagine, few of these ads are for things like broccoli.  Rather the vast majority are for things like sugary cereals and high-calorie snacks.  For every hour of weekly TV viewing there is a corresponding increase in child-calorie consumption.  The childhood obesity epidemic is the main reason the current generation of children will probably be the first generation that has a life-expectancy shorter than their parents.
  5. Sex is used to sell just about everything.  This is particularly bad in TV advertising.  There is a strong correlation between exposure to sexual content in media (like TV) and early initiation of sexual activity.
  6. Aggressive behavior is well correlated to violence in movies:

As much as 10% to 20% of real-life violence may be attributable to media violence. The recently completed 3-year National Television Violence Study found the following: 1) nearly two thirds of all programming contains violence; 2) children’s shows contain the most violence; 3) portrayals of violence are usually glamorized; and 4) perpetrators often go unpunished

Have a TiVo and never watch the commercials?

Doesn’t matter!  The worst content is the content of those things in the TV programs and movies themselves.  Sex, alcohol, smoking, violence, and just about everything else you can think of is glamorized in one way or another by Hollywood.

The Stupid Box

When I was in college my friends & I knew exactly what the TV was for us… the stupid box.  The more time we spent in front of it the stupider we became.  Of course this does not mean that we attempted to limit our TV time.  We had heaps of free time at this stage in our life and using a little TV to dumb-down the aspiring medical students was probably a good thing.

Turns out this does not translate once you become a parent.  My time right now is very limited.  On a good day, between all my responsibilities, I may have a few hours to spend with my wife and kids.  On many days there is just not enough time.  Thus every minute spent in front of the stupid box is time that I am taking away from my much more important priorities… loving my wife and raising my kids.  In fact the Average American watched 153 hours/month of television last year (a 1.2% increase).  That is just over 5 hours a day.

Really?   … and we wonder why our marriages end in divorce, our kids are fat, and roughly 50% of Americans need antidepressants.

Paying for college

Let’s assume for the moment that my theory is wrong.  Let’s also assume that despite the 25,000 hours your child may spend in front of the stupid box before they reach 18, they are able to gain acceptance to college.  Have you ever considered the finances of the TV?

Where I live the Digital Premier package comes to $105/mo.  There is an extra $8/month for HDTV, and $13/mo for the DVR.  Add in some taxes and I am looking at $150/month.  This comes to $1800/year for the stupid box programming that will likely encourage my children to smoke, drink, use drugs, be aggressive, have sex, and be fat.

If instead I put the $1800/yr into a college savings account (CSA), after 18-years I would have around $80,000… more than enough to pay for a 4-year university.

Practicing what I preach…

I must admit, this has been a gradual process for me and my family.  Many years ago when I was a pediatric resident, my roommates and I decided (for financial reasons) to drop the cable package.  Surprisingly, we did not miss it at all.  In fact, the biggest surprise was all the extra time we had once we were able to unglue ourselves from the stupid box.  This was more time to sleep (precious time for a pediatric resident), more time to exercise, and more time to spend with friends.  We even found ourselves rediscovering the lost art of reading a book.

It was not until I got married though that my wife and I decided to actually Sell our TV.  This is not something that we have regretted.  Instead of sitting in front of the stupid box at night we find ourselves engaged in conversation.  To some degree, we have not rid ourselves completely as we still have access to a variety of programs from our computer.  In fact, while we both feel the TV is mostly an expensive intrusion and a terrible influence (especially on our children), we are still reasonable.

Take the Challenge

1.  Remove all but one TV from your house (especially those in the bedroom)

2. Change your cable service to the most basic service offered.  Better yet, buy an antenna and get the local channels for free.

3. Learn how to use your computer for any TV programming that you cannot live without.

4. Put whatever money you save by reducing your cable bill into a College Savings Account (CSA).  Don’t have a CSA… then set one up.

Make a commitment to do this for a year.  Not only will you put your TV on Craigslist at the end of the year, but you will also have a better marriage, smarter kids, and and more money in the college fund.  It is hard to see the downside to this challenge.

Join the 21-day Challenge

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

References

AAP News – Two sided conversations help kids…

AAP Policy Statement on TV

Babywise and scheduling… after 2 babies!

August 11, 2010 by DrReynolds · Leave a Comment 

Baby #2, moving to a new city, starting a new job, and the beginnings of raising our first 2-year-old required a brief hiatus from blogging. While this time has been devoid of blogging, it has been very rich in personal experiences to blog about. Today I am covering the idea of putting your baby on a schedule, which is the focus of most of the controversy when it comes to Read more

Peak Fussiness

May 10, 2010 by DrReynolds · Leave a Comment 

I am happy to report that we are at the 5-week mark with baby #2. In virtually every way baby #2 has been much easier than baby #1. Mostly we attribute this to less trial and error parenting on our part rather than any major difference Read more

No Tylenol for Fever?

April 12, 2010 by DrReynolds · 1 Comment 

If you have read much of what I write about fever, you might find it strange that I tell parents not to give their children Tylenol™ and Motrin™ when they have a fever.  In fact, if you read my Myths & Facts section on fever you will see this:

Myth #3: If I reduce my child’s fever, they will get better sooner. Read more

A fatal blow to the anti-abstinence crowd?

April 9, 2010 by DrReynolds · 3 Comments 

During my career I have watched the “progressive” crowd tout the naivety of an abstinence approach to sex education in teens and adolescents.  They generally go on to push shelling out all kinds of contraceptives to specific “at-risk” populations (like the poor, our school children, sub-Saharan Africans, etc.) while they stand on their pedestal of arrogance lecturing about how ridiculous it is to try and promote abstinence. Read more

Babywise and the Infant Sling?

April 5, 2010 by DrReynolds · Leave a Comment 

In the ongoing debate between Attachment parenting and Babywise parenting it seems that the infant sling is viewed as a tool for attachment parenting only and has no role in a Parent-Directed (Babywise) approach.  However, now that we have two children, my wife decided to test out the sling as a matter of necessity (better to have two free hands to chase our 2-year old around the house). Read more

Iron Drops for Babies?

March 5, 2010 by DrReynolds · 2 Comments 

I am often asked about the need to supplement newborn babies with Iron while breastfeeding.  What seems like a simple question is actually a rather complex issue.  This post is meant to provide parents with the information they need to intelligently discuss this concept with their pediatrician.  Then you, the parent, should decide whether Iron Supplements are appropriate for your baby. Read more

How to Prevent Ear Infections

February 22, 2010 by DrReynolds · 1 Comment 

“An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.”  I am not sure who originally made this quote, but it is certainly true when it comes to ear infections. It is estimated that ear infections cost American families somewhere in the ball park of $5 Billion every year.  This is not to mention the subjective expense of Read more

Does pulling at the ears mean ear infection?

February 16, 2010 by DrReynolds · 1 Comment 

I cannot count the number of times I have seen someone in the ER because their child is pulling at their ears.  No fever or fussiness. No runny nose or cough.  Eating well and drinking well.  Just concern that this could be a subtle sign of an ear infection.

Well, my subjective experience in the ER is that 10 times out of 10 these happy, playful Read more

February H1N1 Update

January 31, 2010 by DrReynolds · Leave a Comment 

Over the last 6 months I have been posting information on H1N1 and what it means for children and pregnant mommies.  I am glad to see that most of the hysteria has subsided.  The fear-mongering from the both anti-vaccine crowd and the media have proven ridiculous.  Yes, some children died from the Flu but this is nothing new.  Thankfully this, like virtually every other year, was a very rare occurrence.  The same can be said for vaccine reactions.  Sure, some kids may have had a reaction to the vaccine, but this again was Read more

Next Page »